Skip to content

How it works

A clear six-step process

No lengthy transformation programme. We improve one process at a time, in plain language, with your team involved throughout.

  1. Step 1

    Understand your firm

    A short conversation about how your firm works, the systems you already use and where routine admin causes friction.

  2. Step 2

    Map the current process

    We write down the process as it actually happens today, including the informal steps people have quietly absorbed.

  3. Step 3

    Identify what to automate

    We agree which steps are genuinely repetitive and predictable, and which must stay with a person.

  4. Step 4

    Build the workflow

    We build a simple, documented workflow around your existing tools, and test it with real examples before it goes anywhere near a client.

  5. Step 5

    Keep people in control

    Approval points are built in. Anything that reaches a client can require review by a member of your team first, and any workflow can be adjusted or switched off.

  6. Step 6

    Measure what improved

    Compare the administrative process before and after automation, looking at both efficiency — such as time and manual work saved — and effectiveness — such as fewer overdue actions, shorter client-update intervals and fewer exceptions requiring human intervention.

A simple method for improving a workflow

Behind the six-step process is a simple principle: understand the work first, remove unnecessary complexity, automate only what is suitable, keep people in control, and measure whether the process actually improved.

MapSimplifyAutomateControlMeasure

  1. Map

    Understand how the administrative process works today, including the people, systems, hand-offs and friction points.

  2. Simplify

    Remove unnecessary steps or duplication before introducing automation.

  3. Automate

    Automate repetitive and predictable administrative tasks where it is appropriate to do so.

  4. Control

    Keep suitable review points, exceptions and human oversight within the workflow.

  5. Measure

    Compare the process before and after implementation to understand both efficiency and effectiveness.

How we measure success

Automation should do more than move work from one system to another. Before building a workflow, we agree what improvement should look like and establish a simple baseline where practical.

Efficiency

Whether the administrative process requires less manual time, fewer repetitive checks or fewer unnecessary steps.

Effectiveness

Whether the underlying administrative process is working better — for example, whether overdue actions are identified sooner, client-update intervals improve, or fewer exceptions need manual intervention.

Example measures

  • Staff hours spent on the process
  • Number of manual checks required
  • Number of overdue actions detected
  • Average time between client updates
  • Number of exceptions requiring human intervention

Where suitable, the same measures can be reviewed after implementation so the firm can see what has actually changed. The aim is not simply to say that a process has been automated, but to understand whether the administrative process became easier to manage and more effective.

Working with us

What to expect from a workflow conversation

A fifteen-minute call, no obligation and no sales pressure. We ask about one process that frustrates your team and tell you honestly whether automation would help.

If a process is better solved by a small change in habit or a setting in software you already own, we will say so. We would rather be useful than sell an unnecessary workflow.

Where is routine admin slowing your firm down?

Tell us about one repetitive process in your firm. We can explore whether a practical workflow could make it simpler, more consistent or easier to manage.